Saturday, December 16, 2006

Another Article About the Sodalits

From QuePasa, a Chilean magazine, November 5, 2005:

El batallón peruano del cardenal




Silenciosamente el movimiento peruano católico Sodalitium Christianae Vitae está penetrando en las tierras del Opus Dei, los Legionarios o los jesuitas: jóvenes de clase media y alta se suman a ejecutivos chilenos que enganchan con el mensaje del compromiso laico. Un grupo que no escapa de la polémica: en Lima los acusaron de "lavar cerebros". Aquí cuentan con la entusiasta venia del cardenal Francisco Javier Errázuriz.
Por: Patricio Corvalán


Relacionados
El benefactor del Opus Dei

La clase alta al diván

María Estela León Ruiz


Para meterse en la tarea de encarrilar a las almas perdidas, los sodalicios prefieren jugar de chico a grande. Saben que es difícil lanzarse a la búsqueda de adeptos de otras comunidades religiosas -como el Opus Dei, los Legionarios y los jesuitas- que les ganan en arrastre, recursos y años trabajados. Por eso lo suyo ha sido más bien silencioso.

Cuando llegaron a Chile, hace seis años y provenientes de Perú, nadie los conocía. La casualidad quiso que cuando este movimiento -que un grupo de intelectuales laicos y conservadores de la clase alta peruana había formado a comienzos de los '70 como defensa de la Doctrina Social de la Iglesia- estaba tramitando la aprobación pontificia ante el Vaticano, el encargado de revisar los papeles en ese momento en Roma era el ahora cardenal Francisco Javier Errázuriz.

Quedó fascinado. Era julio de 1997 y los Sodalitium Christianae Vitae -que traducido del latín sería la Comunidad de Vida Cristiana- postulaban ante el Papa que uno de los objetivos era evangelizar para construir una "civilización del amor", a través de diversas acciones espirituales y de trabajo social. Más allá de las promesas, lo que entusiasmó a Errázuriz fue que los sodalicios les confiaban el papel protagónico a los jóvenes y que, por tratarse de un movimiento de origen laico, podía llegar a ser masivamente más atractivo. Su apuesta ya estaba decidida: había que traerlos a Chile.

Dios lo escuchó en enero de 1999. Errázuriz había llamado a Lima para pedirle al fundador del movimiento, el laico peruano Luis Fernando Figari, que lo ayudara a reimpulsar las pastorales chilenas. Y Figari le respondió enviándole una delegación de cuatro laicos (dos peruanos, un brasileño y un colombiano) para cumplir con sus deseos.

"¿Le parece bien mañana?"

Los sodalicios eran hasta entonces mayoritariamente desconocidos para las comunidades religiosas chilenas. Lo que se sabía era que en Perú sumaban más de diez mil adherentes y que se habían ramificado hacia Colombia y Brasil. Y que eran laicos, porfiados, obedientes y trabajadores. Habían surgido como respuesta a la Teología de la Liberación. En Perú, algunos los tildaban de derechistas y ultraconservadores. "Más ortodoxos que el Opus Dei", decían otros.

La noche en que llegaron desde Lima, el cardenal los alojó en una casa abandonada en Ñuñoa que pertenecía a un noviciado. Después de instalarlos, les contó cuáles iban a ser sus tareas: deberían incorporarse a la pastoral del Colegio Apoquindo -que en ese tiempo se había debilitado por la paulatina partida de los Legionarios de Cristo- y, paralelamente, levantarían una capilla cercana a la avenida Portales, un sobrepoblado sector de Maipú donde la parroquia local no daba abasto para atender a una comunidad de 40 mil personas. Alessandro Moroni ya las oficiaba de superior de la delegación. Apenas Errázuriz terminó de hablar, les preguntó si les parecía empezar en una semana o dos. Moroni miró el reloj y le contestó como sodalicio: "¿Le parece bien mañana?".

La urgencia rindió sus frutos: han logrado penetrar en segmentos juveniles de clase alta y media, convirtiéndose en una alternativa a Legionarios y Opus. El boca a boca es su principal arma de marketing. Pero no sólo han logrado reclutar adolescentes: algunos ejecutivos -como Alejandro Danús, gerente general de Sal Lobos; o Cristián Canevaro, gerente comercial de Viña Concha y Toro- y políticos -como Marta Ehlers, alcaldesa de Lo Barnechea- ya integran sus filas. "Que haya gente de nombre en el grupo nos otorga una cuota de excelencia -dice el vocero de los sodalicios, Andrés Tapia-, porque si ellos están con nosotros es sinónimo de que somos serios".

Ángeles o demonios

No hay medias tintas. En Perú, donde son muy conocidos, se hablan maravillas o calamidades. Si para algunos los sodalicios son una comunidad comprometida y expandida a 19 países, con 14 mil adherentes, 400 consagrados, 20 sacerdotes y un obispo (el auxiliar de Lima, José Antonio Eguren), para otros son una funcional y perfecta lavadora de cerebros jóvenes y confundidos. Es en rigor la figura de Luis Fernando Figari la que despierta las pasiones. Era un alumno aventajado en la Facultad de Teología Pontificia y Civil de Lima cuando en 1971 decidió que el círculo de amigos con los que discutía sobre fe debía ser una comunidad.

Desde ese mismo instante, las aguas se han dividido. Para los seguidores, Figari -hoy con 58 años- ha logrado consolidar el mayor movimiento laical cristiano de los últimos tiempos, lo que le ha valido el reconocimiento del Vaticano, al punto de haber sido invitado por Benedicto XVI para participar en el reciente Sínodo de Obispos. Sus detractores, en cambio, lo han ligado a un grupo violentista llamado Escalones Juveniles Nacionalistas e incluso hablan de acusaciones judiciales que algunas familias peruanas habrían hecho en su contra por haber incitado el abandono de hogar, lo que Moroni -mostrando documentos notariales- se empeña en calificar como mitos sin fundamentos.

Retiros con asados

Curiosamente, esa polémica no atravesó la frontera. La primera imagen de los sodalicios que tienen en Maipú es la de cuatro laicos vestidos de azul y gris, con zapatos lustrados resistiendo las calles de tierra. Llegaban en la mañana, se presentaban en cada casa y terminaban la charla pidiendo los 75 pesos que costaba comprar cada ladrillo para la capilla.

Al otro lado de la ciudad, el rector del Colegio Apoquindo, José Ignacio Concha, recuerda que esos mismos cuatro laicos llegaron también de mañana y que a los pocos días organizaron el primer Convivio, "un retiro que llamó la atención porque mezclaban charlas espirituales con asados y partidos de fútbol mixtos".

Lentamente, la pólvora ya se había encendido. Moroni y compañía terminaron la capilla Madre de los Apóstoles con la ayuda de la comunidad de Maipú, la primera etapa de un proyecto que esperan acabar a fin de año con la obra gruesa del centro apostólico, como llaman a la casa que los alojará definitivamente.

Moroni habla de esto como el siguiente paso para la consolidación. Además de hacerles clases a adultos para que terminen la enseñanza media, y de haber lanzado programas dirigidos a los pobres y a los cesantes, en el 2003 quisieron medir fuerzas. Fue entonces cuando organizaron el Primer Encuentro de la Familia Sodálite -así también se les conoce- como una forma de dimensionar el número de miembros más activos. Esperaban cien personas, como mucho. Llegaron 500.

Para José Ignacio Concha, la clave ha estado en la cercanía con los adolescentes. "Es un movimiento muy conservador, pero que habla de los temas que les interesan a los jóvenes. Es una mirada moderna que interpreta a los católicos de este tiempo". Las cifras le dan la razón. Hay al menos una veintena de estudiantes ligados al Apoquindo -donde incluso el capellán del colegio es el sodalicio peruano Rafael Otero- y al Craighouse que están en una etapa llamada de "discernimiento", en la que podrían optar a convertirse en laicos consagrados o incluso en sacerdotes.

Esto tiene impresionado a Errázuriz. "Existe una resurrección de las vocaciones sacerdotales entre la juventud y en eso es evidente que los sodalicios tienen mucho que ver. Si antes era un carisma casi exclusivo de los jesuitas o del Opus Dei, ahora este grupo silencioso los motiva y más encima les da la opción de ser laicos consagrados", dice un colaborador cercano al cardenal.

Las comparaciones con el Opus Dei son inevitables: conservadores, de derecha, nacidos en la elite. Sin embargo, el peruano Erwin Scheuch, párroco en el lujoso distrito limeño de Monterrico y también vocero de la agrupación, se encarga de marcar las diferencias: "Nosotros somos un movimiento laico, nuestros superiores son laicos y ciertamente no contamos con recursos elevados. No somos una competencia para nadie, porque tenemos nuestro propio carisma. Lo que nos interesa es evangelizar y tener vida comunitaria. Si me preguntan, te diría que somos unos misioneros".

Entonces, ahora las comparaciones apuntan a los jesuitas. "Con los retiros, las misiones, los trabajos en Maipú, los sodalicios están reencantando a los jóvenes -dice José Ignacio Concha-, porque sienten que la religión es más cercana. Y en eso se podría hablar de que a los jesuitas les llegaron refuerzos".

La casa de San Bartolo

En el malecón de San Bartolo, en Lima, donde todos ven la playa, los sodalicios ven la luz. Figari decidió que en esa zona se instalara la casa de formación para quienes hayan decidido consagrarse. El movimiento tiene una compleja estructura que, dicen, garantiza que cuando una vocación está latente se encauce por el buen camino.

Y hay que seguir al pie de la letra las reglas. Cuando algún simpatizante siente su vocación le debe mandar una carta a Figari en la que se le dan las razones por las que se quiere aspirar a integrar el movimiento. "Al aceptársele, la idea es que la persona renuncie a las tentaciones y tenga una vida más acorde", dice Erwin Scheuch. De hecho, esas reglas les imponen a los consagrados el celibato, la obediencia y la comunión de bienes. O sea, los bienes de cada uno son de todos y es un economista designado por Figari quien distribuye las ganancias individuales, las donaciones y el financiamiento del grupo.

Los preceptos sodalicios indican, además, que el aspirante debe estar entre uno y tres años en la etapa de discernimiento. Ahí definirá si se consagra o bien echa marcha atrás.

Al que da el paso hacia delante lo espera la férrea disciplina de San Bartolo. Es un asunto que a menudo se toma literal. Pedro Salinas, un escritor y periodista peruano que perteneció al grupo hasta 1984, publicó una novela titulada "Mateo Diez", en alusión al evangelio que habla de los sacrificios que se deben hacer para seguir a Jesús. En el libro, el protagonista recrea la supuestamente dura filosofía sodalicia, y hace alusión a una vieja frase de la guerra civil española en que a los sacerdotes se les consideraba "mitad monje, mitad soldado", tan acuñada por los detractores del movimiento.

Sodalicios como Scheuch niegan que la formación de los jóvenes sea marcial. Lo que sí confirma es que es intensa. Por ejemplo, después de dormir seis horas, se levantan temprano para correr al borde de la playa y luego nadar 600 metros en el mar. "El deporte es para conseguir la armonía corporal, el temple que se necesita para servir", afirma Daniel Prieto, un estudiante chileno que está a punto de abandonar Derecho para internarse tres años en San Bartolo, lo necesario para convertirse en sacerdote.

Será el segundo chileno en consagrarse con hábitos. El primero es Sebastián Correa, el hijo mayor de la alcaldesa de Lo Barnechea, Marta Ehlers, y quien está en el último año de formación en Lima. Además, una de las hijas de la edil, María José, se transformó en la primera Sierva del Plan de Dios, uno de los movimientos sodalicios para mujeres. Y Fernanda, una de las menores, participa como monitora de un grupo que simpatizan con estas vocaciones.

En todos estos casos, los retiros llamados "Convivios" han jugado un papel vital para que los padres sepan en qué pasos andan sus hijos. "Te plantean conocerte a través de conocer a Dios -dice Luis Germán Edwards, alumno de Ingeniería Comercial en la Universidad de los Andes- y de esa forma te vas respondiendo muchas de las dudas que tienes en esta etapa".

Los críticos apuntan a la sagacidad del grupo. "Hacen como que te escuchan, pero al final terminas metiéndote en una vorágine de compromisos muy intensa, donde si fallas o te arrepientes eres un completo fracasado", dice un renunciado simpatizante. Moroni se ríe. "¿Qué vamos a hacer si alguien quiere irse? ¿Ponerle una pistola en el pecho?".

El próximo gran proyecto de los sodalicios es comprar un colegio o un instituto técnico, probablemente en Lo Barnechea. No les asusta la competencia con el resto de las congregaciones. Para ellos, el rebaño es grande y alcanza para todos
.

----
Note: this, like many other pieces, was written by an academic. He is also a journalist.

Of course, this work and the red flags it subtly raises about the Sodalits are not in english and therefore can't really be fully appreciated by all in North America.

The Catholic Conservative Connection

An idea of an Opus Dei connection is rather far-fetched, innit? And no, I am not referring to the Da Vinci Code as I am sure the Catholic Church would love. They have developed a great press release to deal with the Da Vinci Code and the Opus Dei issue. I am going to take Opus Dei at face value for what they are: a very conservative movement within the church.

Here are some interesting observations of the Sodalits and Opus Dei connection.

First off, Milagros Peña's work tells the reader that the Sodalits and Opus Dei worked together (along with Benedict - then Cardinal Ratzinger) in order to remove liberation theology during the 80's.

Cardinal Luis Cipriani, the Archbishop of Lima is also Opus Dei. He's also incredibly political, having recently said during a spiritual procession of the people (not of political agendas!) that those who are in favour of the morning after pill and call it safe are 'liars and murderers' seen here and here in the press. He has consecrated Bishops Kay Martin Schmalhausen and Jose Antonio Erguren Anselmi of the Sodality of Christian Life, the only two Bishops of the S.C.V movement that exist. Jose Antonio Eguren Anselmi used to be the Auxilary Bishop of Lima with Cipriani until he moved to Piura.

It's not surprising to see that Bishop Eguren Anselmi succeeded control of the Archdiocese of Piura from Cipriani and that previous to both Cipriani and Anselmi, it was controlled by an Orders of Friars Minors (O.F.M.) Bishop. Also, it's interesting to see that Cipriani has succeeded and been succeeded by members of O.F.M., an organization that has been instrumental to Figari's life (see CLM Canada) and also closely connected to Sodalits and Opus Dei in Denver.

Recently, in December, the Sodalits celebrated their Assembly and anniversary in Lima with Cipriani presiding over the final mass, in which he blessed their labour. Ratzinger (Pope Benedict) also blessed the organization and commended them for their great work.

Then there's the connection of the O.F.M. Archbishop Chaput of Denver, who has welcomed in conservative groups Opus Dei and the Sodality Family into his community. His appointed auxilary Bishop was Opus Dei, until that Bishop was promoted to San Antonio, Texas.


Lastly, when the Truth and Reconciliation Commission authors were outspoken about oppressive issues in the Church, it was Opus Dei and the Sodalits who got together to protest them.


Please ask yourself: why do people in these conservative organizations tend to find each other and work together? Please keep in mind that these are only a few examples of their relationships together that are accessible online. They aren't to show any sort of scandalous behaviour, but are merely here to demonstrate that there have been documented links between each other that are significant. The fact that these links span about 30 years should also be taken into consideration that these relationships have been consistent, from the creation of the Sodalits to the present.

If the Sodalits aren't "so conservative", why are they so close to the Opus Dei and to other conservatives? It's absolutely ridiculous to deny that the Sodalits are not a very conservative wing of the church and it is highly questionable from a their vested interest standpoint to actually pursue social justice activities - those which acknowledge injustices and work to ensure that they know longer continue - considering their strong conservative connections within the church and the Vatican.

These interests haven't taken responsibility for the repression they have caused; in fact, as seen in the speeches and words of Figari and Rafael Aguedas (both experienced on both SEA trips to Peru), they praise some of the church's unjust activities. By never recognizing the root of the social problem and developing "social justice" programs based on ideas that fail to recognize these deep issues means that they can offer is charity to the people in the form of infrastructure, social services and education. They can't offer them the same opportunities as them, nor the same privileges that they have. Since the Sodalits have stamped their names in the communities they give to means that the people are dependent on their resources to survive. The people aren't given the ability to make their own decisions and take care of themselves, at least not without the hands of Sodalits or people that are brought into the community. Otherwise they don't "need" any of them.

Wednesday, December 6, 2006

Because the Sodalit Family is very political as-is, it is hard to ignore the personal politics invested in the arguments made. It would be foolish to argue that my approach to this is objective; I most definitely have issues with an organization that is inherently racist and hides behind the veil of creating 'social justice' in resource-poor neighbourhoods. It has been incredibly difficult to find a reason to feel indifferent or favourable toward an organization of resource-wealthy Latinos, whose entire existence is political, whose past is rife with conflict and an absence of transparency, and whose messages are pro-colonial and lack true respect for people of mestizo and indigenous descent.

I recall being told about some of the beliefs by a member of this community of why indigenous people of Peru were poor; it was explained to be a 'cultural problem' as opposed to a 'social problem'. The cultural problem being that the Quechua speaker, although creative, has little capacity to understand complex thought processes, such as those attainable by a Spanish speaker. Secondly, their inability to understand complex economics due to their lack of education is the other 'cultural' issue. Hence, this is why they (rural migrants - Andean people) only participate in petty, simple economic activity. This is a good way of explaining why those 'savages' are poor; they apparently just don't know how to be rich because they belong to an inferior culture with an inferior language!

While again my ideas are political, I find it incredibly dangerous that these sorts of ideas are spread about indigenous/Andean people, considering that none of those who are spewed these versions of the Sodality/creole/conservative realities at any given moment are really in any situation to contact rural migrants from Andean/indigenous backgrounds in a meaningful way and in a neutral/safe atmosphere, although I doubt one can create such an atmosphere with 30 wealthy North Americans in a 'pueblo joven'.

The fact that people participating in 'Solidarity in Action', an organization within the Sodalit Family, are not given the opportunity to explore the reality of the people who they are 'acting in solidarity with' is startling and creating a very slippery slope where assumptions are easily made. These assumptions are then asserted by a Sodality member on the trip, who will explain the social realities of the rural migrants to the ignorant 'do-good' foreigners (from what is a fairly racist creole perspective). The notion that the kindness and the 'purity of the heart' of those who live in the 'pueblos jovenes' of Lima are then assumed to be partially caused by the solidarity between the organization 'there to help' and the 'grateful' and 'needy' community.


And we haven't even begun to speak about the ideas spread about liberation theologists and non-conservatives. Having read this article written by a sympathizer of the movement, who had only four days of experience with the Sodality movement, it is apparent that some of the same ideas spread by this organization are already being spewed from his mouth!

"My four days in Peru were spent as the guest of a remarkable religious community you may not have heard about, the "Sodality of Christian Life." Sodality means "promise" or "friendship," and in Peru, I encountered both."

On the other Catholic Institutions:
"San Pablo has already become the leading Catholic university in Peru and is now drawing students from adjacent countries. The older Catholic institutions, such as Catholic University of Lima, are centers of extreme left, radical feminist and pro-abortion ideology. Remnants of the liberation theology that thrived in Peru in the '70s and '80s still exist. (Remember the ex-nuns who assumed combat fatigues and protected terrorists in the name of the people?)"

This is incredibly humorous, as Luis Fernando Figari started in PUCP (Catholic University of Lima) and launched his attack from PUCP on the Liberation Theologist Catholic thinker, Gustavo Gutierrez, who worked in PUCP. The fact that Luis Fernando Figari's movement has contempt for this institution is strange, as radical right-winged movements also were created there. This is perhaps their way of 'othering' less right-wing institutions from their newly founded San Pablo University.

The idea of liberation theology as pro-Senderista [Sendero Luminoso - Shining Path] is also derived directly from the Sodalit Family. The fact that liberation theologists believed in political action does not mean that they supported terrorism or terrorist activities. In fact, liberation theologists spoke out against violent conflict, as it was not part of their theology (at least that derived from Gustavo Gutierrez). Secondly, the fact that in the Takillakkta songs translated and through the speeches of Luis Fernando Figari and his members, the outright support and graciousness for the arrival of the Spaniards, who murdered many indigenous people, is absolutely hypocritical considering that the Sodalites try and portray themselves as anti-conflict and anti-violent by their strong stance against terrorism. I suppose that if they could rationalize non-believers as inhuman, the murders of so many indigenous people during the conquest could be justified and allow them to conclude the Spaniards who came to the Americas were blessed by God and not murderers (remember, the conquest wasn't peaceful by any means).

A couple of interesting afterthoughts on the Sodalits: if they are so anti-terrorist and pretty much all of the victims of terrorism were mestizos or indigenous, why is it that there is no 'solidarity' between indigenous or mestizo organizations and the Sodalit Family? Secondly, why is it that the Sodalit Family doesn't acknowledge the Commission for Truth and Reconciliation, which strives to bring social justice to families affected by terrorism and is actually reported to be in conflict with them? [please refer to the source section, where there is an article about right-wing organizations attacking authors of the Truth and Reconciliation document] Any measure that acknowledges the grave injustices against indigenous people and seeks to ensure the poor treatment of indigenous and mestizo people doesn't happen again I would consider as social justice.

Anyhow, my purpose was not to prove the fallacies of that statement, although it is always important to be critical. The ability for this gentlemen who was in Peru for four days to gain that social commentary on Peru in four days is nearly impossible, at least without being manipulated or told what to think and what to say about certain issues by the people he was surrounded with.

I hope that this example given can help sympathizers of this organization understand that short stints with this organization produce biased 'truth-spewing' based on the words of Sodalits, whose questionable, manipulative tactics are already under scrutiny. By looking at this example, I hope people will think critically about what they have been told and where these ideas came from.

Sunday, December 3, 2006

The Christian Life Movement USA

I guess this gives some context of how the Sodalit Family, particularly the Christian Life Movement [CLM] is related to North American Politics, as it's more difficult for most Canadians (and Americans) to relate to Latin American politics.

It appears that Denver is the capital of Catholic conservatism in the USA.

Taken from CLM Canada (http://www.clmcanada.org/page2.html):

"When he was 7 years old, he received the Sacraments of Reconciliation, Communion, and Confirmation. Presiding over the Liturgy was Archbishop Juan Landázuri, O.F.M., who would later have an important role in the approval of the Sodalitium Christianae Vitae, as well as in other religious societies Luis Fernando established."

The CLM USA stronghold is within the city of Denver, whose diocese is run by O.F.M. Archbishop Chaput.



Chaput's political motivations during the 2004 election

"Archbishop Chaput has discussed Catholic priorities in the election in 14 of his 28 columns in the free diocesan newspaper this year. His archdiocese has organized voter registration drives in more than 40 of the largest parishes in the state and sent voter guides to churches around the state. Many have committees to help turn out voters and are distributing applications for absentee ballots.

In an interview in his residence here, Archbishop Chaput said a vote for a candidate like Mr. Kerry who supports abortion rights or embryonic stem cell research would be a sin that must be confessed before receiving Communion.
"



Support for CLM
"Now present throughout the world [the CLM], both Archbishop Francis Stafford and Archbishop Charles Chaput welcomed the group to the U.S. by way of the Archdiocese of Denver. The consecrated male community was formally established in 2003."


Here is an interesting piece written on the Archdiocese of Denver written by a Catholic newsgroup from Australia


The article acknowledges the relationship of Denver's former Archbishop, now Cardinal Francis Stafford in the Vatican. It is no coincidence that the Sodalit Family can grow in Denver, an area with such support of the Vatican. It is also no coincidence that there are very strong connections between Pope Benedict and the Sodalit Family and strong connections between the Pope and these Archdiocese in Denver. An Opus Dei cleric was appointed as the Auxilary Bishop in Denver as well.

"In Denver, Archbishop Chaput took over an archdiocese that had been patiently refashioned during the ten-year tenure of J. Francis Stafford, a theologian and intellectual who is now a cardinal and head of the Pontifical Council for the Laity in Rome. It was then-Archbishop Stafford, observers say, who first identified Denver as an "emerging city" and set about building a local Church to match its energy and dynamism. He brought in top lay advisers, encouraged new religious orders and movements to relocate there, built close ties with Latin American Church leaders, and made the Church a respected voice on issues ranging from urban sprawl and "hyperdevelopment" to evangelisation and the Internet...

Some critics fault Archbishop Chaput for speaking with what they say is a muted voice on social issues. "There is no deep commitment to the poor - the priority now is with these very conservative theological efforts," complains Loreto Sister Anna Koop, who has run a Catholic Worker house for Denver's needy and homeless for nearly 25 years. Sister Koop complains that Archbishop Chaput has done little to protest against gentrification and development efforts in Denver or the skyrocketing cost of living, all of which have displaced hundreds of poor families and made housing unaffordable except for the very wealthy. The Archdiocese's "only legislative interest is in pro-life and anti-gay and lesbian things," she says....

As he looks forward himself, Archbishop Chaput sees the face of his Archdiocese rapidly becoming Hispanic. The ordination in March of Auxiliary Bishop José Gomez, a 49-year-old Mexican priest of Opus Dei, marked another turning point in the Archdiocese's understanding of itself, Archbishop Chaput says: "We will begin to see ourselves as a diocese that is inherently bilingual, inherently multicultural.
"



An essay written by Chaput

"I write a lot of letters every day because a lot of people write to me, and my parents always taught me that ignoring anyone is bad manners. So I always write back, which means I have a lot of interesting pen pals, some happy, some angry and a few who are a little strange. One of the angry ones emailed me a few weeks ago to complain that the Archdiocese of Denver was becoming a magnet for every flaky, right wing new group in the Church. And I immediately thought: Thank you for a great way to begin my talk on St. Francis.

It's true that God has raised up many new charisms and communities in the Church over the last 60 years, and especially since Vatican II. It's true that all of them have their special weaknesses along with their special strengths. And it's also true that the Archdiocese of Denver has tended to welcome them with an openness which they may not always find elsewhere. I think that's partly because of the vision of my predecessor, Cardinal Francis Stafford, and partly because of the conversion our own local Church has undergone since World Youth Day 1993.

But in each of these new charisms that has taken root in Colorado -- groups like the Community of the Beatitudes, the Neocatechumenal Way, the Christian Life Movement, the Fellowship of Catholic University Students, the charismatic renewal, Opus Dei, Cursillo, the Marian Community of Reconciliation, Families of Nazareth, and most recently a wonderful apostolic society that began 30 years ago in Peru, the Sodalitium Christianae Vitae -- in each of these cases, their spirit is something very familiar to anyone who knows St. Francis....
"

Enjoy Takillakkta

Takillakkta is a group that is strongly associated with the Sodalite Family; there is no coincidence that the musicians are from Figari's organization.

Basically, they feature consecrated laymen (of largely European descent) that play zampoñas, guitars, quenas and other Andean and creole instruments.

Most english speakers probably do not have a clue as to what they're hearing and seeing.

Here is the page: TAKILLAKKTA


And here are the songs translated:

1492

When Christopher Columbus discovered this continent,
The history of evangelization began,
Blessed discoverer of the Americas,
The New World was waiting for Christ the Redeemer

Passing through (the ocean) by caravel, in the sea under the stars,
They arrived to our land (the Americas),
And left profound footprints,
In the history of the Americas by the evangelization

Spain was chosen to bring the gospel to the bronze-skinned men[sic]
That were yearning for God.

With saintliness and heroism by the missionaries,
The glorious guidance was forged by the Virgen del Pilar

Year 92 of the distant 15th century
Broke dawn on our horizon with the light of faith,
The day del Pilar, the beautiful 12th of October,
Jesus Christ arrived to us

Teaching and preaching with the word and by example,
Our Saints blossomed, evangelizing the indian[sic], the black, the creole and mestizo with the faith of our God

This is the inheritance that they left us,
That which forges our history,
Let us unite our strengths to continue the labour of Christ!

Latin American brother, with heart in hand, let us work together to bring reconciliation!


Evangelization

This is the glorious history of the heroic deed of evangelization of this continent, our Latin America.
History of valiant men, of heroic Saints, history of lights and shadows, history of our faith.

When Christopher Columbus discovered this continent,
From Spain they sent people to preach,
The evangelization has pages of glory,
The history reminds us of it and it's certain that it is as said (refering to the pages of glory?),
This evangelization has pages of glory,
In order to help remind us of the memory of the Saints being there

There is Saint Paul Claver and Saint Rosa of Lima,
That arrived in Latin America to bloom,
They were changed with the duty of Anthony of Montesinos,
And as well with Saint Toribio and the mulatto[sic] Saint Martin,
Defending until the end the dignity of the poor.

The annnouncement of faith in Latin America
Was a devine blessing that like right here I will tell you,
In its origin and in Christianity being preached,
Through catechisms, prayers, songs and orations,
With dances and processions and with singing of the divine

Indian, white and people of colour, they were converted since early times,
Thus, the American continent met our Lord

The messengers of peace, they fought for justice,
Bartolome de las Casas (Saint) and as well Saint Louis Beltran,
Defending the poor, the Indian and the indian dignity,
The message of God came to America to proclaim,
Defending the poor, the Indian and the indian dignity,
The life of Bishop Valdivieso was given to deliver

Let us remember the missions of the fathers that gave help,
That into the rainforest they arrived preaching the gospel,
and the faithful missionaries, the Francisican friars,
that for Christ they conquered from Lima to Chiloé,
It is almost unbelievable the poverty(shortage/penury) that existed.

Some Sources of Information

These are the following articles gathered about this organization thus far. Many articles need command of Spanish to understand what is being said.

It is a shame that so much is written in Spanish and that many English speakers do not have access to this information for their own interpretation. It's the same issue as those that live in the poor regions, who can't communicate with mission workers because they don't share the common tongue.



Catholic Totalitarianism in Peru (in Spanish)
"The Sodalit Movement is Nazi-Fascist, it is the Creole Opus Dei..."


A lady complains about the abduction of her child by the sodalites to the Peruvian Government (in Spanish)



Caretas - Los Once Mil Castos (in Spanish)
One family searches for their son who has been apparently brainwashed and kidnapped by the organization... The youth of the movement laugh at the idea of being brainwashed, manipulated; they say they've been evangelized...



Caretas - the Responses to Los Once Mil Castos (in Spanish)
A response from the spokesperson of the organization, threatening about legal action for defamation of the organization. Attached to his message is the son of a family who launched a complaint about the organization, who was apparently kidnapped. The son's message said his dad was threatening his life (spiritual/physical??) and he is fine and happy in Sao Paolo.



The Mysteries of the Sodalits (in Spanish)
Questionable practices of the organization and torturing to show God's love are discussed in this article.



Follow-up to The mysteries of the Sodalits (in Spanish) More threats by the organization. The writer tends to tread back on himself; mentions the goodness of the organization at the end and how they help the poor.



The Sodalits Infiltrate Arequipa [some more](in Spanish)
This is Peru indymedia, which definitely has their own alternative perspective. They state that fundamentalist sodalites try and take over more educational facilities in Arequipa, where youth attend, for the purpose of brain-washing them/manipulating their minds. This article is further vindication that the organization is controversial and involved in manipulative activities, which starkly different journalist sources claim as well.


Parents reject Catholic school to be kept in the hands of a religious sect (in Spanish)
One parent is worried that the fundamentalist organization will brainwash their kids and put them through humiliating and torturing tests to prove their faith. The group is considered an extreme right-winged group from the 60s.


A Discussion Board about Religious Cults and Sects that Discusses The Sodalit Movement (in Spanish)



Argentinians Concerned about the Sodalit Movement(in Spanish)



Peru indymedia wasn't too impressed with the right-wing church movements' protest (Opus Dei, the Sodalit family and other) of a book written by former participatants in the Truth and Reconciliation Comission about right-wing church groups
The Truth and Reconciliation Committee sought to explain the atrocities against campesinos during the 1980s and 1990s. There was a lot of terrorizing happening at this time, not just the Sendero Luminoso and the Tupac Amaru movement; three governments were implicated for human rights violations.


There are still other articles that weren't included in this list! The same themes surface each time.

Some academic literature:


Swatos, W.H. (ed.). 1995. Religion & democracy in Latin America. New Brunswick, N.J., U.S.A.: Transaction Publishers.

Peña, M. 1995. Theologies and Liberation in Peru: The Role of Ideas in Social Movements. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. 222 pp.